Paid more than the record supports
Codes the record doesn't support
A complication with no treatment behind it, or a severity the notes don't show. These move a claim into a higher-paying group.
For insurers and health funds
MEDIKODI Lens checks the coding behind every hospital claim you pay, and shows the evidence for every finding, in both directions.
When a claim is paid by DRG, the codes decide the benefit. But checking them means requesting records, waiting, and reviewing a sample by hand.
Every claim, not a sample
Upload a month or a year of claims. Lens checks each one and tells you which are worth a record request, and why.
Findings in both directions
Paid more than the record supports
A complication with no treatment behind it, or a severity the notes don't show. These move a claim into a higher-paying group.
Paid less than the record supports
Conditions and procedures the record supports that never made it onto the claim. Reported separately, so neither side hides the other.
Reporting both is what makes the findings credible, and what keeps the relationship with the hospital intact.
Ready for the right of response
Every finding is written up so it can go to the hospital as it is. No opinion against opinion.
What was claimed, and the group it put the episode in.
The line in the notes that supports it, or the absence of one.
The coding standard or convention that applies, by name.
Where the episode groups if the finding stands.
Across your network
One claim rarely tells you much. A hospital whose complexity keeps climbing while its peers stay flat does.
Compare hospitals, DRGs and periods against the same indicators, and go into the next contract conversation with the pattern in hand.
One method, both sides of the claim
Hospitals can run Lens on their own coding with the same rules. So when you disagree, you're discussing the record, not whose method is right.
The fastest way to judge Lens is against an audit you've already done. You'll see what it agrees with, what it adds, and what it would have saved you requesting.
Join the Lens pilotFirst call
A hospital, a group of DRGs or a period that's been on your mind. The pilot answers something real.
Before anything moves
Claim data alone, or with the admission records. How it's shared is agreed with your privacy and security teams before anything moves.
Once Lens has run
We go through every finding with your team, and compare it with your past audit results if you'd like.
Either works. With coded claim data alone, Lens checks the coding against the classification, the coding standards and the grouping. With the admission's documentation, it also checks each code against what the record says.
No. It tells your auditors which claims are worth reviewing and why, so records are requested where they matter. A qualified auditor confirms each finding, and your team decides what to raise with the hospital.
A finding shows the code, the line in the record and the rule, so the hospital can check it directly. Hospitals can run Lens too, with the same rules, so a disagreement is about the record rather than the method.
No. It also reports documented care that wasn't coded. The two are reported separately, which keeps reviews fair and conversations with hospitals easier.
Lens assesses only the episode being claimed, not a member's wider history. Sensitive details are de-identified before assessment, and hosting is agreed with your IT and security teams. See security & trust.
Lens is in a pilot with a small group of insurers and providers. Send a sample of claims and see what it finds.